NBA BEATS - I
think Mike Brown was part of the problem. I think the mistake made
though was by upper managment for bring in Dwight Howard. Horrible move.
All the Lakers needed was a Steve Nash. In my opinion the lakers where
the team to beat until they brought in Dwight Howard. I would way rather
have Pau Gasol. And Nash would do wonders for Kobe. Kobe could play
stress free. I have never been a fan of Howard. He is just a superior
being in regards to his physical body. They guy does not have much
talent though. Plus he is a diva and is just gona tear up the locker
room. Horrible move bring him in. Have never been a big fan of Mike Brown either.
It was bound to happen. When the Los Angeles Lakers went winless in
the preseason it raised a few eyebrows, but the preseason is not always a
good indicator of regular season success. When the games started to
count, though, the losing became more troublesome. Considering the
number of changes to the Lakers’ roster, the new offense being
implemented, the lack of depth and the injury to Steve Nash, firing the
head coach is a bit like putting a band-aid on a cracked dam.
The turnover alone would be enough to derail any NBA team. Yes, the
Lakers have four All-Stars in their starting lineup, but once you get
past the starters there is a noticeable drop-off in talent. Dwight
Howard has foul troubles from time to time, and Jordan Hill is hardly a
suitable stand-in. Steve Nash’s age was a concern from day one, yet the
best the Lakers have behind him is Steve Blake, who has struggled since
he arrived in L.A. Kobe Bryant has been as dominant as ever, but should
he need to miss games for any reason the Lakers would be leaning on
Jodie Meeks, who is shooting 28 percent on the season. The only position
where the Lakers have a strong back-up is at forward, but even Antawn
Jamison has had a hard time sparking the team off the bench.
The starting lineup is another story. Bryant is the most demanding
teammate in the NBA, a lesson that Pau Gasol learned immediately upon
being acquired by the Lakers. Howard does not approach the game with
anything like the same level of seriousness as Bryant, and Howard’s
recent comments about people needing to “lighten up” are no doubt in
reference to Bryant. No one takes losing as personally as Bryant, and it
seems only a matter of time before he has to go off on Howard in an
effort to get him to take losing more seriously. Until he does, the
Lakers will continue to struggle, no matter who is doing the coaching.
Finally, there’s the new offense, which seems to have turned Nash and
Howard into bystanders instead of dominant, game-changing players. The
Princeton offense, in particular, is a brilliant offense when it’s run
properly. Rick Adelman, for example, has had great success with it for
many years, spanning a large number of All-Star players on five
different NBA teams. It worked with Terry Porter and Kevin Duckworth in
Portland, it worked with Vlade Divac and Mike Bibby in Sacramento, and
it worked with Yao Ming and a variety of supporting players in Houston.
There’s no reason why that offense couldn’t work with Howard and Nash as
the primary catalysts, but it’s not something that happens overnight.
There are plenty of reasons for the Lakers’ struggles to date. Lack
of depth and the correspondingly low bench production would top my list,
and that has little or nothing to do with coaching. Brown was handed a
team and told to go out and compete for a championship, but the
composition of that team is not such that competing for a championship
is necessarily a given. Sure, the starting lineup is impressive, and
that lineup has struggled to get on the same page. That comes down to
coaching, but the other factors at play are beyond what Brown, or any
other coach, can control.